tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3992560227304007969.post1953202871089050443..comments2024-01-19T17:07:45.138-07:00Comments on Xenorama: Power Rangers: the Movie: the reviewX7http://www.blogger.com/profile/16050119714244967980noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3992560227304007969.post-49118927352506126522011-08-03T16:37:25.274-07:002011-08-03T16:37:25.274-07:00I think in doing a little research this movie did ...I think in doing a little research this movie did make a fair amount in return of it's rather meager budget. <br /><br />it looks like the BO return was 3X it's cost, so it made money, and all the toys... so that would be why a lousy, truly lousy, sequel was made. <br /><br />sentai + cars = lame. always. lolX7https://www.blogger.com/profile/16050119714244967980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3992560227304007969.post-58583192950939775392011-08-02T17:38:55.894-07:002011-08-02T17:38:55.894-07:00I cannot even remember who Fred is. Though, obvio...I cannot even remember who Fred is. Though, obviously, you are going to correct that.<br /><br />I never thought of it as a "good" movie, but it was adequate enough. The CGI issue bothered me a lot then, and sort of still does now. This is one of the textbook examples of people thinking they can do effects "better" because they have computers, bragging about it, and then utterly failing. Honestly, Toei has since done it just as effectively, with less money.<br /><br />I never understood why TURBO got made in the first place. It's not as if this movie was a rousing success.C. Elamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00284263547435956344noreply@blogger.com